Younger people have their own information gathering patterns

New research commissioned by Forbes Advisor tells us that 24% of younger people use social media instead of traditional search engines to find things online. Other recent studies, including some that aren’t US-focused like that one, have said the same. Google even flagged this trend two years ago.

While this latest research tells us a lot about what is happening, it doesn’t dive into why this is happening. So here’s my two cents on the matter.

I think there are three trends at play here.

1. Each new generation breaks from the information gathering patterns of previous generations

When some people read the headline ‘Is Social Media The New Google? Gen Z Turn To Google 25% Less Than Gen X When Searching’ their first thought is that the younger generations are “doing it wrong”.

I disagree. I think all generations break from the information patterns created or established by older generations. This is particularly true on the internet, where things change very quickly.

I’ve been on the internet for a very long time so I’ve seen the same hand-wringing about (then) youngsters doing things wrong when people started getting most of their news and information from:

  • blogs instead of newspapers,

  • then social media instead of blogs,

  • then micro-blogs (like Twitter) instead of more established social media (like Facebook),

  • then news aggregators (like Apple/Google News) instead of official news media apps or websites,

  • then closed networks (like WhatsApp and Discord) instead of more open ones (like YouTube, Facebook, and Reddit), and

  • now TikTok instead of YouTube or search engines.

This has happened before. And it will happen again whenever a new, hot technology is ready to be embraced by the next generation.

2. The commercialisation of the web

Other than Wikipedia, the majority of news and information gathering sites on the web are commercial in nature. As a result, many of them will:

  • use clickbait headlines,

  • publish junk articles,

  • run low quality ads,

  • host poorly disguised sponsored content, and

  • not keep their editorial arm separate from their advertising arm (if those two arms were ever separate in the first place).

Young people see this and they don’t trust the organisations that do it.

There is also So Much Crap out there. Do some research about, say, which air fryer to buy and you’ll have to wade through a dozen highly SEO-optimised and commercialised best-of lists. And by ‘commercialised’ I mean the list-makers will have taken ad money from brands for inclusion or a higher ranking in those lists.

It’s no wonder people are turning towards first-hand knowledge sharing and more personal recommendations from real people on platforms like TikTok.

And yes, many of those TikTokkers won’t declare their biases or sponsor lists, so if you focus too narrowly on just what one group has to say, you’ll end up in an information bubble. But, hey, at least it’ll be a bubble of your own peers and the people you relate to :) But more on breaking out of information bubbles in a minute.

3. The enshittification of Google

Google used to be a great search engine, but it let its advertising arm bully its search arm into jamming more and more ads and sponsored content into the search results, making its crown jewel far less useful than it used to be.

Google also isn’t doing as good a job as it used to against the sheer volume of low quality content the web is now filled with. The irony, of course, is that by making it super easy for anyone to host automated Google Ads on their website, Google itself enabled (and continues to enable) the existence of all this junk web content. Now if Google wants to make lots of money through its Ads business, it has to keep directing people to the crappy websites on which its own ads are running.

The end result is that Google makes tonnes of money while we get low quality search results. So it makes sense why people (especially younger people) are trusting big tech companies less and less over time.

Word of mouth always wins

Given those three trends, you can see why a good proportion of younger people the trust results and recommendations they get from their peers and influencers more than what they get from other sources. And since more of their peers and influencers are currently on TikTok, that’s where they’re going to find the information they seek.

(Even the older generations that primarily use Google for their search needs understand the power of personal, word-of-mouth recommendations. That’s why so many of them include the search parameter “site:reddit.com” in their queries because they know they’ll get much more trustworthy and far less commercially-biased results from forums like Reddit.)

Will this trend away from search engines continue? Where will we go from here? I don’t know. But what I do know is that (a) nothing ever dies completely and (b) patterns are cyclical. Take radio, for example. It didn’t die off when television was introduced. Younger people listen to a lot less radio than older people do, of course, but it still has a place in our information ecosystem. And over the years parts of it have even made a comeback in the form of podcasts, which a good proportion of younger people do listen to.

So while youngsters might continue to move away from large, generic search engines like Google for their information gathering needs, it’s not like those search engines will ever go away. The balance will shift, the flow of advertising money will adjust, and a new equilibrium will be reached.

You can’t do any of this without good media literacy

The one thing that will never change is the need for continuously-updated media literacy for all generations. Without that you won’t know if what you’re reading or learning about is accurate – or at least accurate enough for your purposes.

Fortunately, it’s not that difficult to look a little wider and find a whole range of voices on a particular topic. And if you’re online for long enough and you’re even halfway decent at spotting patterns, you’ll learn about people’s biases (commercial or otherwise) relatively quickly. There was even a meme on Tumblr about this a few years ago that went something like: “me, sitting on my Casper Mattress, eating my Hello Fresh meal, using NordVPN to connect to my Better Help therapy session” :)

Media literacy goes a long way in helping people form an informed opinion (or at least a slightly less uninformed one) on how much to trust each of their information sources. Basically, it doesn’t matter where we get our information from, as long as we all keep our ‘bullshit meter’ plugged into our information gathering chain.

Where do I go for News and Opinion?

While trying to decide whether I’d sign up for a Fairfax Digital Subscription or not (I ultimately decided not to) I thought it would be fun to document my news media consumption habits. (Being a nerd is so much fun!)

Here’s what I came up with.

Breaking News 

Where do I go to get breaking news? 

When a news tory breaks the first site I check is Twitter.

I then move on to Reddit to see what news content has been aggregated and bubbled-up by the online community. There I get both first-hand news and news that’s been collected by various outlets.

Next I check the BBC because they'll always have the most reliable and least biased story.

Finally, I go to Google News because that service quickly aggregates lots of news stories from multiple online sources, covering multiple angles.

If the breaking news is Australia- or Melbourne-specific I also check the Age and the ABC (though, in most cases, their news stories get captured pretty quickly by Google News anyway). I sometimes also check the online streaming versions of ABC News 24 and a few radio stations like ABC NewsRadio, 774 Melbourne, and 3AW.

More in-depth news and editorial opinion

What if I want more depth? 

When I want a little more depth to a news story my first stop is usually the BBC. Those folk not only excel at presenting an overview of what’s going but they also give a bit of background and then flesh out those bits of the story that are important at the time. (I usually follow this up by a few quick searches on Google and Wikipedia if I want more information.)

However, if want a much deeper analysis or some high-quality editorial opinion on a particular topic or story then the sites I go first to are academic news outlets like the Conversation, a bunch topic-specific blogs (I subscribe to a lot of blogs via RSS), and sites with strong editorial voices and traditions like the Guardian and the Economist.

I then visit a bunch of independent news outlets or, categorizing them more broadly, sites from which I get smart, well written, and mature news reports, opinion, and discussion. These include ProPublica, The Global Mail, New Matilda, Salon, Slate, the Atlantic, and a handful of others. 

Aside from those major sources I also read some blogs and feature pieces on the ABC and Fairfax websites (e.g. stuff written by Lauren Rosewarne or Sam de Brito). However, ABC and Fairfax don’t have the depth of coverage that the sites mentioned previously do; nor do they have as many contributors whose editorial opinions I value that much.

Local News & Opinion

What if the story is local? 

When a news story is local my preferred sources are the Age and the ABC (including, as mentioned above, the online streaming versions of ABC News 24, ABC NewsRadio, and 774 Melbourne). Though, increasingly, the Guardian with its new Australian edition is becoming a bigger part of my regular local media consumption.

Meanwhile, 3AW and the Conversation, while good sources, don’t cover as much as the Age and ABC do.

Daily Media Consumption

Speaking of my regular media consumption, these are the news sites I check on the tram both to and from work every day and also on weekend afternoons:

Daily Media Consumption.png

The top four are the important ones: I check the Age for updates on what’s happening in the city and around the country. I check the BBC and the Guardian to find out what’s going on in the world. And, I check the ABC to read more about what’s going on in both Australia and the world.

If I have time left in my commute then I then close that folder and check Reddit (the app in the background in the top left hand corner).

And if after that I still have more time I sometimes check my RSS feeds via NewsBlur and occasionally read the stories I’d saved earlier in Pocket.

As you can see, restricting my Fairfax consumption to thirty articles per month isn't going to be difficult because Fairfax is already a pretty small part of my news media consumption mix. This despite the fact that I check the Age website every morning because, when I do, I only occasionally click-through to read a whole article - I usually just skim the headlines.

So there you have it, my media consumption preferences. What sites do you visit to get news and opinion?